EVIDENCE BASE IN DESIGN
When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.
In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.
Guide On Rating System
Vote
Recently, there has been a proposed health policy to implement a sugar tax in order to reduce the consumption of sugary drinks and address the rising rates of obesity and diabetes. This policy is based on the evidence that excessive consumption of sugary drinks is strongly associated with an increased risk of these health conditions.
Multiple studies have shown a consistent link between sugary drink consumption and weight gain. A systematic review conducted by Malik et al. (2013) found that an increased intake of sugary drinks was associated with a higher risk of obesity in both children and adults. The study highlighted the need for policies regulating the consumption and availability of sugary drinks, including taxation.
Furthermore, evidence from observational studies suggests that implementing a sugar tax can effectively reduce the consumption of sugary drinks. A study conducted in Mexico by Colchero et al. (2016) found a significant decrease in the purchasing and consumption of sugary drinks following the implementation of a 10% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. The study estimated that this tax could prevent around 189,300 cases of obesity and 20,400 cases of type 2 diabetes over a 10-year period.
In addition, evidence from other countries that have implemented sugar taxes, such as Hungary and Norway, also supports the effectiveness of this policy in reducing sugary drink consumption. A review conducted by Briggs et al. (2013) found that taxes on sugary drinks in these countries led to a decrease in consumption and a potential reduction in the burden of diet-related diseases.
However, it is important to consider potential drawbacks and challenges associated with implementing a sugar tax. Critics argue that it may disproportionately affect low-income individuals and lead to unintended consequences, such as an increase in the consumption of other unhealthy beverages or declining revenue from the tax. These concerns should be carefully addressed when designing and implementing the policy.
In conclusion, the evidence in support of implementing a sugar tax as a health policy to reduce the consumption of sugary drinks and address obesity and diabetes is substantial. Multiple studies have consistently shown a link between sugary drink consumption and adverse health outcomes. Furthermore, evidence from countries that have implemented sugar taxes suggests that it can effectively reduce consumption. However, careful consideration should be given to potential drawbacks and challenges in order to design a policy that is equitable and maximizes the desired health outcomes.