The Michigan Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) declares that it is the state’s policy to give all persons full information about the actions of the government and that "the people shall be informed so that they may participate in the democratic process", subject to FOIA's privacy exemption. The privacy exemption: the privacy exemption consists of two elements, both of which must be present for the exemption to apply. First, the information must be of a “personal nature.” Second, the disclosure of such information must be a “clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Courts have determined that information is of a personal nature if it reveals intimate or embarrassing details of an individual's private life. The union of clerical workers at Michigan State University requested the trustees of the University to give them the names and addresses of the persons making monetary donations to the University. Michigan State objected because the disclosure of addresses was a violation of the right of privacy.
What will the Michigan Supreme Court decide in this case? Apply the IRAC method of legal reasoning by stating the Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion. There are no wrong conclusions (if your conclusion is supported by analysis).
Guide On Rating System
Vote
Issue: Whether the disclosure of names and addresses of individuals making monetary donations to Michigan State University violates their right to privacy under the Michigan Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?
Rule: The FOIA in Michigan provides for full disclosure of government actions but has a privacy exemption. According to the exemption, for it to apply, the information must be "of a personal nature" and the disclosure of such information must be a "clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy."
Analysis: The union of clerical workers requested the names and addresses of individuals making donations to Michigan State University. The question is whether this information qualifies as "personal" under the FOIA's privacy exemption. Courts have previously determined that information revealing intimate or embarrassing details of an individual's private life falls under the definition of personal nature. Donors' names and addresses, while personal information, may not necessarily reveal intimate or embarrassing details about their private lives. Additionally, it is essential to consider whether the disclosure would amount to a "clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy." While there may be privacy concerns associated with the disclosure of addresses, it is necessary to assess the weight of these concerns against the policy of informed participation in the democratic process.
Conclusion: The Michigan Supreme Court will likely decide that the disclosure of names and addresses of individuals making monetary donations to Michigan State University is not a violation of the right to privacy under the FOIA. While the information is personal, it does not reveal intimate or embarrassing details about individuals' private lives. Moreover, the court may find that the disclosure is warranted as it serves the policy of informed participation in the democratic process. However, it is important to note that this conclusion may vary depending on the specific facts and evidence presented in the case.
Got a question with my answer?
Cheapmath.com is completely free!
Asking question is free.
Getting answers is free.
+99