Do experimenters always provide ethical oversite, interpret and report results?
When tailoring a measure, what are some things that may need to be done to make sure it is the same measure as when it began?
Guide On Rating System
Vote
Experimenters typically provide ethical oversight, interpret and report results, but this can vary depending on the specific research context and design. In many cases, experimenters are responsible for ensuring that the research is conducted in an ethical manner, following relevant ethical guidelines and obtaining appropriate informed consent from participants. They are also responsible for interpreting the data collected and reporting the findings accurately and objectively.
However, in some cases, particularly in larger research projects or when multiple researchers are involved, there may be designated individuals or committees responsible for ethical oversight and data interpretation. For example, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) or Ethics Committees are often established to review and monitor research to ensure ethical guidelines are followed.
Regarding tailoring a measure to ensure it remains the same, several steps can be taken:
1. Establish a clear and detailed protocol: Clearly define the purpose of the measurement, its intended use, and the specific steps involved in administering and scoring it. This ensures consistency across different administrations.
2. Pretest the measure: Before using the measure in the main study, conduct a pilot test with a small sample to identify any potential issues or areas for improvement. This helps in refining the measure and ensuring its reliability and validity.
3. Train the researchers or administrators: If the measure is administered by different individuals, ensure that they receive proper training on the administration procedures. This reduces the chances of variations in how the measure is administered.
4. Monitor the data collection process: Continuously monitor the data collection process to identify any potential sources of error or variation. This can involve regular check-ins with researchers, periodic audits of data collection procedures, and ongoing communication to maintain consistency.
5. Conduct reliability checks: Assess the internal consistency or inter-rater reliability of the measure by analyzing the data collected. This helps to ensure that the measure is providing consistent and reliable results.
6. Conduct validity checks: Evaluate the construct, criterion, and/or content validity of the measure to ensure that it is accurately measuring what it intends to measure.
7. Avoid modifications without validation: Once a measure has been established, it is important to avoid making modifications without proper validation. If changes are necessary, they should go through a rigorous process of testing and validation to ensure the measure remains the same after modification.
By following these steps, researchers can aim to ensure that the measure remains consistent throughout its use.