The evolution of Cisco from a university campus networking solution to a global technology leader has been a dynamic process. The speed of technological innovation means that managers are already talking about the “next new thing” during the launch of each new product or service. Parallel with the rapid technological evolution at Cisco are the changes in organizational structure. As Cisco expanded, visionary John Chambers was brought in as CEO, and he expanded the company into advanced technologies. By 2000, Cisco had attained a brief designation as the world’s most valuable company. Will the evolution of Cisco continue? And if so, what will it look like? Company history indicates that, just as a quick response is needed in the rapid evolution technology products and services, the company must remain aware of structural changes needed within the organization to maintain its leadership position.
Discuss the organizational structure at Cisco Systems.
What design changes were needed?
How did globalization affect Cisco’s structure?
How has Cisco’s structure continued to evolve?
Prepare your responses in a Word document that is a minimum of 2 pages in length. At least two references are required. Please be sure to cite and reference in APA.
Guide On Rating System
Vote
The organizational structure at Cisco Systems has undergone significant changes over the years to adapt to its rapid growth and evolution as a global technology leader. In the early years, Cisco operated under a functional organizational structure, where employees were grouped based on their areas of expertise or specialized functions. However, as the company grew and expanded into new markets and technologies, the need for a more flexible and integrated structure became evident.
John Chambers, who became CEO of Cisco in 1995, played a pivotal role in restructuring the organization to foster innovation and agility. He shifted the focus from a functional structure to a matrix structure, which allowed for cross-functional collaboration and faster decision-making. This change enabled Cisco to better respond to market demands and rapidly develop and launch new products and services.
In addition to the matrix structure, Chambers introduced various other changes in the organizational design at Cisco. He implemented a system of councils and boards that brought together top executives from different business units to discuss key strategic initiatives. This flat structure allowed for more decentralized decision-making and empowered employees at all levels to contribute their ideas and expertise.
As Cisco expanded its operations globally, the company had to adapt its organizational structure to accommodate the diverse markets and cultures it operated in. The globalization of Cisco's business necessitated the establishment of regional offices and business units in different countries, each with its own leadership team. This decentralized structure allowed Cisco to tailor its strategies and operations to the specific needs of each market, while also leveraging the advantages of a global scale.
The evolution of Cisco's structure has continued to reflect the changing dynamics of the technology industry. In recent years, the company has shifted towards a more network-centric structure, recognizing the importance of collaboration and connectivity in the digital era. This network-centric model emphasizes the integration of people, processes, and technologies across different business functions to foster innovation and accelerate decision-making.
Another significant change in Cisco's organizational structure is the increased focus on strategic partnerships and acquisitions. The company has formed numerous alliances and acquired several companies to access new technologies, expand its product portfolio, and enter new markets. These partnerships and acquisitions have led to the creation of specialized business units and teams within Cisco, allowing it to effectively manage the diverse range of products and services it offers.
In summary, the organizational structure at Cisco Systems has evolved from a functional model to a matrix and network-centric structure, driven by the need for agility, innovation, and global scalability. The company's growth and expansion, as well as its response to technological advancements and market demands, have necessitated these design changes. By embracing a flexible and integrated structure, Cisco has been able to maintain its leadership position in the industry and stay ahead of the curve in the fast-paced world of technology.
Got a question with my answer?
Cheapmath.com is completely free!
Asking question is free.
Getting answers is free.
+99