Discuss the correspondences between the ER model constructs and the relational model constructs. Show how each ER model construct can be mapped to the relational model, and discuss any alternative mappings?
Guide On Rating System
Vote
The entity-relationship (ER) model and the relational model are two popular data modeling techniques used in the field of database design. While the ER model is based on entities, relationships, and attributes, the relational model is based on tables, tuples, and attributes. There are several correspondences between the constructs of these two models, and I will explain how each ER model construct can be mapped to the relational model.
1. Entity: In the ER model, an entity represents a real-world object or concept with its own characteristics and properties. It can be mapped to a table in the relational model. Each attribute of the entity becomes a column or attribute in the table.
2. Relationship: A relationship in the ER model represents an association between two or more entities. In the relational model, a relationship can be mapped by creating a foreign key in one table that refers to the primary key of another table. This foreign key establishes the relationship between the two tables.
3. Attribute: An attribute in the ER model defines a property or characteristic of an entity or relationship. In the relational model, an attribute is represented as a column within a table, storing the specific information tied to the entity or relationship.
4. Composite Attribute: A composite attribute is an attribute that is composed of multiple smaller attributes. In the relational model, a composite attribute can be represented by creating separate columns for each smaller attribute.
5. Multivalued Attribute: A multivalued attribute is an attribute with the ability to take multiple values for a single entity. In the relational model, a multivalued attribute can be represented by creating a separate table that relates back to the main table, storing the multiple values as separate rows.
6. Cardinality and Modality: Cardinality refers to the maximum number of occurrences of one entity for a single occurrence of another entity in a relationship. Modality represents the minimum number of occurrences. Cardinality and modality can be represented in the relational model by using foreign keys and additional tables to enforce the appropriate constraints.
Alternative mappings can be used depending on the specific requirements and constraints of the database design. For example:
1. Instead of mapping a relationship directly between two tables using a foreign key, a separate table could be created to represent the relationship itself. This approach can be useful when the relationship itself has attributes or when there are many-to-many relationships.
2. In some cases, an attribute of an entity in the ER model may be represented as a separate table in the relational model. This can be done when the attribute has a complex structure or when it has a one-to-many relationship within the entity.
These alternative mappings provide flexibility in representing the ER model constructs within the relational model, allowing for different approaches to accommodate specific requirements. Ultimately, the choice of mapping depends on the nature of the data and the goals of the database design.
Got a question with my answer?
Cheapmath.com is completely free!
Asking question is free.
Getting answers is free.
+99