Answer 1:

The systems model of evaluation research is a comprehensive and holistic approach to evaluating the effectiveness and impact of a program, policy, or intervention. It views the subject of evaluation as a dynamic and interconnected system, where various components and processes interact and influence each other. This model considers not only the direct outcomes of a program but also the underlying processes, contextual factors, and feedback loops that affect those outcomes.

In the context of public policy in criminal justice, the systems model of evaluation research can provide valuable insights. By examining the various components and interactions within the criminal justice system, such as law enforcement, court processes, correctional facilities, and rehabilitation programs, policymakers can gain a better understanding of how these elements affect each other and the overall effectiveness of the system. This knowledge can inform policy decisions aimed at improving the criminal justice system, identifying areas of intervention, and optimizing resource allocation.

Answer 2:

Kalief Browder was a young man from the Bronx, New York, who was arrested in 2010 at the age of 16. He was accused of stealing a backpack and subsequently placed in pretrial detention on Rikers Island, one of the most notorious correctional facilities in the United States. Despite being a minor, Browder was held at Rikers for three years, awaiting trial until his case was eventually dismissed in 2013.

During his time at Rikers Island, Browder experienced significant physical and emotional abuse, including violence from both inmates and guards. He spent extended periods of time in solitary confinement and continuously faced delays in his trial, leading to prolonged incarceration without a conviction. Following his release, Browder's mental health deteriorated, and he tragically took his own life in 2015.

Browder's case gained national attention and became a catalyst for discussions about the flaws in the criminal justice system, particularly related to pretrial detention and the treatment of juvenile offenders.

Answer 3:

Several actions could have been taken differently in the case of Kalief Browder to prevent the tragic outcome:

1. Expedited Trial Process: Efforts could have been made to accelerate Browder's trial to avoid the extended period of pretrial detention. Delays in the criminal justice system often result in prolonged incarceration without conviction, as it happened in Browder's case.

2. Juvenile Justice Reforms: Browder's age should have been taken into account, and alternative options to pretrial detention, such as community-based programs or supervised release, could have been explored.

3. Improved Conditions: Measures should have been taken to ensure Browder's safety and protection from violence and abuse during his time at Rikers Island. This could involve better monitoring, stricter oversight, and improved training for correctional officers.

4. Mental Health Support: Given the traumatic experiences Browder faced during his incarceration, proper mental health support and counseling should have been provided to address the psychological impact of his time in detention.

5. Reforms in Solitary Confinement: Browder spent extensive periods of time in solitary confinement, which has been proven to have detrimental effects on mental health. Reforms limiting the use and duration of solitary confinement could have mitigated the harm caused to Browder.

Overall, a multifaceted approach involving systemic reforms, policy changes, and improved procedures could have made a significant difference in the outcome of Kalief Browder's case.

Got a question with my answer?

Message Me

Cheapmath.com is completely free!

Asking question is free. Getting answers is free.

+99

Continue