Compare and/or contrast two columns created by different cultures (i.e. you may compare a Minoan column to a Greek Corinthian column, but do not compare/contrast a Greek Doric column to a Greek Ionic Column)
Guide On Rating System
Vote
One example of two columns created by different cultures that can be compared and contrasted is the Mesoamerican column and the Egyptian column.
The Mesoamerican column, specifically the Mayan column, was a unique architectural feature found in the ancient Mayan civilization. These columns were often found supporting important structures such as temples and palaces. Mayan columns were typically made from stone, and their design often featured intricate carvings and hieroglyphs. They were generally tall and slender, with squared-off tops resembling a stepped pyramid.
On the other hand, the Egyptian column, specifically the Ancient Egyptian column, was a prominent element in Egyptian architecture. Egyptian columns were also made from stone, such as limestone or granite, but they had a more cylindrical shape compared to Mayan columns. The most distinct feature of Egyptian columns was their capital (top part), which came in several different styles, including the lotus flower, papyrus, and palm leaves.
One major contrast between these two columns is their overall shape. Mayan columns had a stepped pyramid-like shape, which was often associated with symbolism and significance in Mayan culture. On the other hand, Egyptian columns had a more rounded and cylindrical shape, making them visually distinct from Mayan columns.
Another contrast lies in their capitals. Mayan columns typically had simple squared-off tops, while Egyptian columns had intricate and detailed capitals, often incorporating natural motifs like plants and flowers. This demonstrates the emphasis placed on aesthetics and symbolism in Egyptian column design.
However, a similarity between these two columns is their use of stone as the primary material. Both Mesoamerican and Egyptian cultures had advanced stone-working techniques, allowing them to create these impressive column structures that have stood the test of time.
In conclusion, the Mesoamerican column and the Egyptian column differ in terms of their shape and capital design. The Mayan column had a stepped-pyramid shape with simple squared tops, while the Egyptian column had a more rounded cylindrical shape with intricate capitals. However, both columns utilized stone as their main material and reflected the sophistication and artistic achievements of their respective cultures.
Got a question with my answer?
Cheapmath.com is completely free!
Asking question is free.
Getting answers is free.
+99