According to the U.S. national government census, the number of children who fell below the poverty threshold in 2022 is approximately 12.4% or 9 million children (under the age of 18).
a. Which frog would we use (mean, median or mode) to get this result?
b. I’d like to understand the range in cost of living for these children living in poverty – which frog would I use (mode, median or mean)?
c. Third question, I would like to better understand how these 9 million children are impacted by poverty- which research method(s) would best assist me in trying to better understand the children’s plight?
Guide On Rating System
Vote
a. To obtain the result of 12.4% or 9 million children falling below the poverty threshold, the appropriate metric to use would be the mode, as it represents the most frequently occurring value in a dataset.
b. To understand the range in cost of living for these children living in poverty, the most suitable metric would be the mean. This is because the mean takes into account the values of all children, providing a comprehensive measure of the average cost of living for these individuals.
c. To better understand the impact of poverty on these 9 million children, a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods would be beneficial. This could include methods such as surveys or interviews to gather personal experiences and narratives from the children, as well as statistical analysis to identify patterns and correlations in their socioeconomic conditions. Additionally, conducting focus groups or case studies could provide more in-depth insights into the specific challenges faced by these children and possible interventions to alleviate their situation.